
We make the future tense by using the verb "to be" and the verb root word. We make the present tense by using the verb root word or the verb "to be", am and an "ing" word, walking. English verbs have five basic forms: the base form, the - S form, the - ing form, the past form, and the past participle form. Perfect tenses present perfect have shut has shut past perfectiAlso known as: pluperfect had shut had shut future perfect will have shut will have. More Verb Tense Examples Past Tense She was talking to her friends. We also make the past tense by using the verb " to be" and add "ing" word.We do not add "d" or " ed" to the irregular past tense verb, but change the spelling. Example Hannah told him about her holiday. Some verbs have irregular past tenses.We usually make the past tense by adding "d" or "ed" to the verb root word.But I wouldn't anyway, because I don't believe you would ever pay me back. But if the word could were to be heavily stressed in that example, this would unambiguously convey that I'm only talking about being able to lend, not actually lending.ģ: If I had the money then I could lend it to you.
#Shut in past tense how to
The likely implication of If I had the money I could lend it to you is that I really would lend you the money in that hypothetical situation, so effectively could and would are interchangeable there (and both are in fact used). HOW TO REMEMBER IRREGULAR SIMPLE PAST AND PAST PARTICIPLES IN ENGLISH Base Form, Simple Past, Past Participle set, set, set shut, shut, shut split, split. The wind was too cold, so I shut the window. When someone puts their lips together so that no air or food can go in or out of their mouth, the person is shutting their mouth. Things can get even more complex with modal forms such as could in such contexts. When someone moves a door so that people can't go through it, the person is shutting the door. It's syntactically perfectly valid for him to say If you were unkind then I could not let you pass, but this would mean something different (as with my earlier example, could would imply he had the ability to let you pass, even though he might not in fact do so. Which he contrasts with the hypothetical possibility of you not being kind (if that were true, he would not let you pass).

to put a person or animal in a place that they cannot leave. OP's brother is basically saying Because you are kind, I will let you pass by me. past tense: shut in: past participle: shut in: DEFINITIONS 1. But #2 simply asserts that in that scenario I would be capable of beating you (but we might never fight anyway). And #1 asserts that in some hypothetical situation where I was strong, I would definitely beat you. Stop me when this becomes true, but once upon a time, you and I went on a date. Tell me anywhere you'd like to go on a date.

where since the subjunctive refers to an "unreal, untrue" situation, it's pragmatically implied that I'm not strong. One minute in your company, and suddenly I'm thinking of new paint colors. The could/would distinction is also irrelevant to subjunctive contexts such as OP's. They just mean different things ( could = I was able to do that, would = I usually did that). Twenty years ago I could / would cycle to work every day is perfectly valid with either verb form. OP's brother is completely mistaken in thinking could is any more appropriate than would for actual past tense contexts. It doesn't refer to what you were in the past, but to some hypothetical / unreal / "not here-and-now" situation (often called an irrealis reference). In the general construction If you were X then, were is an example the subjunctive mood. The cited example is nothing to do with "past tense" as such - it's a subjunctive usage.Įnglish basically only has two verb tenses (Present and "Not Present").
